Thank you for this, it should be incredibly useful :) Ed
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) < ppfis...@cisco.com> wrote: > Nailed it. > > The bug was only happening in setups with single working thread, which was > not the case in my test setup. > Test succeeded. The patch is ready to be merged. > > I am going to create a new vpp-sandbox directory called vhost-test. > This sandbox effort intends to provide reference scripts for testing VPP > vhost user, in the most user-friendly fashion (hopefully). > Goal being to give pointers to people willing to test vhost user, but also > to give reference parameters and configuration for people willing to use it. > > Thanks everyone, > > - Pierre > > Le 28 oct. 2016 à 10:55, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) <ppfis...@cisco.com> a > écrit : > > So I tested in my setup with qemu from git with tags: v2.5.0-rc0 > v2.5.0-rc1 v2.5.0 v2.5.1 > They all work. > > Could you please have a look at the patch and give me some more logs ? > VPP with VHOST_USER_DEBUG_SOCKET set to 1 usually helps a lot, as it logs > all vhost messages received by VPP. > > Thanks, > > - Pierre > > > Le 26 oct. 2016 à 23:45, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) < > mkons...@cisco.com> a écrit : > > Excellent, thanks Ed! And let’s see … > > -Maciek > > On 26 Oct 2016, at 22:40, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maciek, > > Looks like the patch was based at a point in the past that was pointing to > the old CSIT branch. > > I rebased the patch, so hopefully it will now pick up the correct CSIT > branch. > > Ed > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) < > mkons...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> //reduced list, updated subject >> >> Peter is right: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2922/16 >> >> looking at the last failed job - https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vp >> p-csit-verify-virl-master/1940/consoleFull - it's using old csit branch >> - "CSIT_BRANCH=oper-161017", without ubuntu1604, so pointless. you should >> rebase to pick up this commit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3553/ that's >> updating to latest csit branch oper-161024. >> >> -Maciek >> >> On 26 Oct 2016, at 10:06, Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES >> at Cisco) <pmi...@cisco.com> wrote: >> >> Looks like it is still testing with oper-161017 not oper-161024. >> >> + CSIT_BRANCH=oper-161017 >> + git clone https://gerrit.fd.io/r/csit --branch oper-161017 >> >> Can you please use the latest one (code rebase)? >> >> Thanks. >> >> *Peter Mikus* >> Engineer – Software >> *Cisco Systems Limited* >> >> Planned absence: 28.10., 1.11., 17.11., 9.12., 19.-31.12. >> >> *From:* Pierre Pfister (ppfister) >> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 26, 2016 10:52 AM >> *To:* Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) < >> pmi...@cisco.com> >> *Cc:* Andrew Theurer <atheu...@redhat.com>; Douglas Shakshober < >> dsh...@redhat.com>; Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; Bill >> Michalowski <bmich...@redhat.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>; Rashid >> Khan <rk...@redhat.com>; kris...@redhat.com; csit-...@lists.fd.io; >> Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com>; Thomas F Herbert < >> therb...@redhat.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% >> loss >> >> The recheck failed. >> https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1937/console >> >> Are you sure you updated qemu ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Pierre >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> csit-dev mailing list >> csit-...@lists.fd.io >> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > vpp-dev mailing list > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > csit-dev mailing list > csit-...@lists.fd.io > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev >
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
