Excellent, thanks Ed! And let’s see … -Maciek
On 26 Oct 2016, at 22:40, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com<mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>> wrote: Maciek, Looks like the patch was based at a point in the past that was pointing to the old CSIT branch. I rebased the patch, so hopefully it will now pick up the correct CSIT branch. Ed On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkons...@cisco.com<mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>> wrote: //reduced list, updated subject Peter is right: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2922/16 looking at the last failed job - https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1940/consoleFull - it's using old csit branch - "CSIT_BRANCH=oper-161017", without ubuntu1604, so pointless. you should rebase to pick up this commit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3553/ that's updating to latest csit branch oper-161024. -Maciek On 26 Oct 2016, at 10:06, Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <pmi...@cisco.com<mailto:pmi...@cisco.com>> wrote: Looks like it is still testing with oper-161017 not oper-161024. + CSIT_BRANCH=oper-161017 + git clone https://gerrit.fd.io/r/csit --branch oper-161017 Can you please use the latest one (code rebase)? Thanks. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited Planned absence: 28.10., 1.11., 17.11., 9.12., 19.-31.12. From: Pierre Pfister (ppfister) Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 10:52 AM To: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <pmi...@cisco.com<mailto:pmi...@cisco.com>> Cc: Andrew Theurer <atheu...@redhat.com<mailto:atheu...@redhat.com>>; Douglas Shakshober <dsh...@redhat.com<mailto:dsh...@redhat.com>>; Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com<mailto:damar...@cisco.com>>; Bill Michalowski <bmich...@redhat.com<mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>; Rashid Khan <rk...@redhat.com<mailto:rk...@redhat.com>>; kris...@redhat.com<mailto:kris...@redhat.com>; csit-...@lists.fd.io<mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>; Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com<mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>>; Thomas F Herbert <therb...@redhat.com<mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss The recheck failed. https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1937/console Are you sure you updated qemu ? Thanks, - Pierre _______________________________________________ csit-dev mailing list csit-...@lists.fd.io<mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
