http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1991/eirv18n24-19910621/eirv18n24-19910621_022-dr_giuliano_preparata.pdf
"The basic mechanism that makes superradiance work is that there must be a system that can communicate electromagnetically only on a well-defined, sharp frequency. If you have a lot of frequencies, this radiation simply disperses itself. If electrons emit always at one particular frequency, then you have a tremendous amplificatior effect." In a magnetic polariton soliton the condition for a single well defined EMF frequency is met, That frequency is that of the soliton. On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > This is the guy who merged superradiance into LENR. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuliano_Preparata > > > > The key concept you may be looking for is a type of positive feedback > called “lock-in”. Robert Dicke was responsible for developing the "lock-in > amplifier" which is an indispensable tool in EE. > > > > Superradiance is not gainful in itself. It is balanced by subradiance. > However, secondary effects, which are ostensibly unrelated, can leverage > superradiance into net gain (or turn subradiance into anomalous cooling). > > > > > > *From:* Axil Axil > > > > Some of the us vortex folks think LENR involves superradiance based on > magnetic polaritons. I don't yet understand is how infrared photons are > converted to a condensed ultra short burst of an intense magnetic field. > Does anyone understand how superradiance can produce a burst of magnetic > energy? > > Superradiance intensity goes as the N^2 of the number of polaritons. Pulse > duration goes as 1/N of the number of polaritons. That scaling relationship > will produce a powerful pulse when there is 10^23 polaritons confined in > the magnetic polariton soliton. That means that the pulse has an > amplification factor of 10^46 of a photon spin of 1. How many tesla does > that workout to? > > Does anyone here understand this branch of science? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superradiance > > or those who think Wikipedia is or dummies, reference this: > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.1298v1.pdf >
