From: Steve High
If you scroll to page 221 you will see the same language as in the first document, but there is no 3.48 prediction, unless that is embedded in the numbers that are presented… So has he hit it out of the park or not? I am not skilled enough to be able to tell. IMO… no homer here. Instead it looks there is a weak attempt at a retrofit a previous (and confusing) factor, which was not a prediction of dark matter until it turned up in another way. In fact, as should be apparent to Mills the radiation seen in several remote galaxies comes from such a great distance that it must be strongly red-shifted, by the time we get it - but RM proposes a value that is LESS than the value seen. Doh. The Rydberg value should be more, not less. There are several Rydberg values which fit but not the one he offers.
