Those who have been around the alternative energy scene for long enough are certainly aware of the niche which is now called simply "HHO". The name is loaded - it implies that there is a fundamental difference in two forms of split water. HHO was once called "hydroxy" or Browns gas and is not fully split into H2 and O2. It is claimed to retain special properties.
The broader field derived from the devices and claims of Garrett, Rhodes, Yull Brown, Puharich, the Graneau's, Stanley Meyer, Santilli, Boyce, Daniel Dingle, Rustum Roy/Kanzius and many others who published information (some scientific, some anecdotal) on various aspects of water energy anomalies, often in the presence of electrical fields, either via electrolysis, RF, direct arc or cavitation. Wiki has an article on the scam aspects, which sadly excludes the actual science. No surprise that Wiki is taking sides in another controversial subject. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water-fuelled_car Mills new paper should be read in that context. Basically it is an HHO paper, which is cleverly disguised as something else in order to shoehorn it into a theory (and especially into IP) which does may or may not apply, due to the vast amount of prior art. http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/ContHOH.pdf Normally in science, the author strives to gives credit to prior art, but apparently Mills is above that. OTOH his numerous supporters and shills will proudly trumpet, probably in response to this post, that Mills has finally explained what the others before him have seen glimpses of - and he owes no duty to actually lower his status to their level, by way of acknowledgement. Maybe so. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" George Santayana
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
