My takeaway from this paper is that Randy has embraced the inverse Rydberg state of hydrogen as an equivalent description of his hydrino but he doesn't finish describing the correlation between astrophysical hydrogen and inverse rydberg hydrogen which is important.. Mills also embraced the paper by Jan Naudts when it came out describing the hydrino as relativistic hydrogen.. what bothers me is that he doesn't elucidate on the inverse nature of this relativistic effect since the atoms are not approaching C or the bottom of relativistic well. we have to consider ourselves, outside the NAE, as the participants at the bottom of the relativistic well wrt to these contracted hydrogen atoms exposed to a negative well. Lorentzian contraction occurs from both the top and bottom perspective of a relativistic well and it is normally only in the same vector as the spatial displacement as said velocity approaches C or in the direction of equivalent acceleration via gravity but in the case of suppression you side step the normal Pythagorean nature of these two relationships and the contraction becomes symmetrical/perpendicular to all 3 spatial vectors as the temporal vector is modified directly without any need of velocity or equivalent acceleration.
Also "large amounts of Hydrogen with favorable conditions for collision" Fran Moreover, m H catalyst having the most probably transition of H to H(1/2) was shown active in astrophysical sources. Specifically, multi-body collision reactions of H with another serve as a catalyst to form H(1/p) in stars, the Sun, and interstellar medium, all having large amounts of atomic H. Favorable conditions for H-H collisions are a very dense population of atomic H such as in the Sun and stars. From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 8:48 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo] BLP New Mills paper, with replication reported Corrected link: http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/ContHOH.pdf
