Heh i've been playing around with that idea since reading a book on chemical memories when I was 12.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Nigel Dyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > My suspicion is that many of Sheldrakes 'non-materialist' ideas, such as > the idea that memories are not just physical traces in the brain will turn > out to be true, but will also turn out to be materialist and grounded in > the science that we already understand. > > Nigel > > > On 08/01/2014 06:36, [email protected] wrote: > > On 8/01/2014 1:03 PM, Rich Murray wrote: > > ... > The Scientific Creed and the Credibility Crunch for Materialism > by *Rupert Sheldrake*, Ph.D; biologist and author of Science Set > Free<http://www.deepakchopra.com/book/view/927> > ... > > > Worth taking a look at the Sheldrake interview relating to the Scole > Experiment <http://www.victorzammit.com/evidence/scole.htm> (see near end > of last youtube video on the page as well as in the main 1.5hr program). > Having seen what he saw with his naked eyes, it is hardly surprising that > he is no longer a fundamentalist of "scientific materialism" persuasion (if > he ever was)! > > >
