about no regulation against, I was not clear,. I want LENR at home free to use, only after a reasonable runtime in industry, when people could manage youth problems...
in fact, some early regulation to make a slow start at home (only for installation out of home first, then only in cave, then...), but not the "IT IS FORBIDDEN BECAUSE SCAREMONGER SAY SO", as I expect in france, and probably in EU... officially for safety, in fact for protecting economic rents, and local religions of anti-science. maybe I'm a bit sick of french politician mentality today... forbid , forbid , forbid. If the world was french, talking of LENR would be punished and all book would be burned. We start to hate freedom here. on any subject. 2014/1/8 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> - no regulation against lenr at home (when certified in industry) >> > > Maybe we should have a delay of a year or two before certifying it for > home use. We may want to delay before using it in automobiles or ships. > Definitely we want to wait before using it in aircraft. That calls for > extreme reliability as well as safety. > > > - help to protect insurance company from unexpected LENR risk (reinsurance >> by state), to avoid frightening insurance cost >> - regulation to make home LENR reasonably safe, to avoid accident: >> mandatory maintenance like gas boilers >> - regulation to make incident identified, and problems corrected, to >> increase safety and increase trust, and reduce the chance of tail risk on >> many reactor... or to stop all if it is finally unreasonable (blackswan >> risk identified in few home). >> > > Good suggestions. > > > - laisser faire for the rest, especially research (no need of subsibies, >> since lenr makes money) >> > > I would like to see subsidies for other energy sources reduced, and > eventually eliminated. > > - Jed > >
