Here is some thoughts about how a strong magnetic field can screen charge. One of the conservation laws is the conservation of isospin in nuclear reactions.
In 1932, Heisenberg defined that the proton and neutron be considered as different charge substates of one particle, the Nucleon. A nucleon is ascribed a quantum number, isospin, conserved in the strong interaction, not conserved in electromagnetic interactions. Nucleon is assigned isospin I = ½ The proton has an isospin of ½ The neutron has an isospin of -1/2 DGT states that no LENR reaction occurs when the isospin of a nucleus of a nickel isotope is not zero. When nickel fusion of copper occurs, the copper isotope has an isotope with an isospin that is non-zero. Doesn’t this mean that the nuclear reaction is an electromagnetic one since the conservation of isospin through the LENR reaction is not conserved? The sole distinction between the proton and the neutron is their isospin quantum values. The difference in the charge of the proton and the neutron is a direct fallout of their isospin differences. Therefor there is isospin charge coupling. So charge is a function of isospin. Charge is conserved because isospin is conserved. Charge changes when isospin changes. The charge of the subatomic particle is a scalar number. Both charge and it associated isospin is independent of spin. When a strong magnetic field is applied to a fermion, if the z component of the isospin aligns with the z component of the magnetically aligned spin, then spin-charge locking occurs. The quantum Hall effect is predicted for a fermion by using the magnetic flux quantization in the presence of a strong magnetic field. For electrons confined in two dimensions, the fractions of charges found in the experimental data on the quantum Hall effect are well predicted by using new spin symmetries. The usage of negative spin and 4 states for spin ½ are characteristic features of this theory. There is spin-charge coupling for the electron. The charge of a particle changes upon changing spin. Here is an easy to understand description of composite Fermions that are produced in a strong magnetic field. THE COMPOSITE FERMION: A QUANTUM PARTICLE AND ITS QUANTUM FLUIDS http://users.phys.psu.edu/~jain/Physics_Today The form of the wave function C provides an insight into why the repulsive interaction between electrons might force vortices on them. The wave function is very effective in keeping the electrons apart. The probability that any two will come within a distance r of each other vanishes like r2(2p+1). Contrast that with the r2 vanishing for a typical state satisfying the Pauli principle. In essence, then, electrons transmute into composite fermions by capturing 2p vortices because that is how they best screen the repulsive Coulomb interaction. The interaction between composite fermions is weak because most of the Coulomb interaction has been screened out—or used up— in making them. Because nuclei, protons, neutrons and quarks are fermions, it is reasonable to suspect that duel magnetic flux vortexes form that affect isospin and its associated subatomic particle charge. Because the atomic nucleus is a layered structure in terms of fermions, so the LENR reactions associated with the application of strong magnetic fields will also be layered and multi-leveled. Furthermore, the non-reactivity of Ni61 might be explained by a incompatibility between its isospin and the orientation of the applied magnetic field where charge spin locking cannot occur. On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 7:44 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > The levels that you list are quite large. If the magnetic fields > emanating from each of the nano antennas were of that magnitude I would be > concerned that they would generate a force against their neighbors that > would rip the material apart. Maybe one day you can explain how these nano > sized constructions co exist. > > Light photons or IR ones have oscillating magnetic and electric fields and > if a very large number were trapped in one of these tiny resonators I can > imagine how those fields might disrupt nearby nuclei and the orbital > electrons. The hydrogen free proton could easily be accelerated by the > electric field vector which is oscillating at a frequency that is > relatively low when compared to nuclear events. The amount of energy given > to the protons could well reach a level adequate to breech the coulomb > barrier if enough photons were trapped.(~10000?) But if this happens, are > we to expect the behavior seen in hot fusion? This may have been discussed > earlier, but the magnetic field in this region due to those photons would > also be very intense and this might be the avenue for the release of the > fusion energy. > > Earlier someone felt that time was not available for the nuclear event to > interact with nearby particles due to the time it takes electromagnetic > energy to reach those particles and return. This was shown to be untrue > since the local nucleus would immediately interact with the intense > magnetic field that exists in its vicinity and is not dependent upon the > source particles directly. I think of the process as depending upon the > past behavior of those particles. > > So, a very intense local electric field working with its associated very > intense magnetic field might be able to breech the coulomb barrier and > allow the energy released to be delivered via the magnetic field. That is > an interesting concept, but I am not confident that it could happen that > way. The interaction of an extremely large, slowly changing(IR frequency) > local magnetic field might be the missing link. We know that some > mechanism must exist to extract the fusion energy without requiring gamma > rays or neutrons and perhaps this particular idea is worthy of > consideration. > > I read something about an X-Ray laser the other day. The device used a > particle accelerator and undulating magnetic field to generate the rays. > Perhaps this would be a good place to begin. > > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Sat, Jan 4, 2014 4:25 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:McKubre visitors who peer-reviewed his lab, then get > (unethically) silent > > It has been experimentally verified that the energy density reached in > these photonic traps reach a high EMF level of 10 to the 15 power watts per > square centimeter before the chemical based detectors used for EMF power > density measurements are destroyed. The experimenters have not found a way > to measure power levels higher than this chemical detector destruction > level. But these Nanoantenna experiments are not ideal. The Ni/H reactor is > an ideal photonic energy concentrator where far more power density can be > produced. The Reason, nickel and hydrogen are used. > > It is possible that the magnetic field produced by these photon cavities > in the Ni/H reactor are between a minimum of 10 to the 5 power Tesla and a > probable level of 10 to the 12 power Tesla at nano dimensions of the > probable nano cavity size based on the DGT revelation that 1.6 T was > measured at 18 cms. > > > >
