I agree that Elforsk and all evidence we have don't eliminate the risk that E-cat does not work well... that it is unstable, unreliable, or have problems...
what this article rules out is that e-cat does not exist, is not working at all, is a fraud... of course some will try to stick on their position taht it is a fraud, because if it is not a fraud, it mean that LENr is real, and that the physicists claims in 89 were absurds, and all the others claims who parroted the initial ones, were absurds parroting with less and less excuse with time passing. in fact this "less and less excuse" explain the desperate delusion... they are like the last square of soldiers who know that they will die in the battle, because they will have too many opponents blood on their hand. denying LENr today is.... pff... you can be prudent, careful, expert murphism, denounce exaggerations... but denying all is denialism. 2013/10/23 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Impressive. Looks like Elforsk has decided that the May report has >> some merit. >> > > As noted they already said that in the previous press release: "The > measurements show that the catalyst gives substantially more energy than > can be explained by ordinary chemical reactions." I doubt they would have > approved the Levi paper acknowledgement for publication if they did not > think it has merit. (I mean they would have asked Levi et al. to remove > their name from the paper.) Organizations such as ELFORSK and EPRI are > careful about what they endorse. > > > >> This is definitely an event which increases the probability of what Rossi >> is doing will work. >> > > You mean this increases your confidence that what Rossi is doing will > work. The actual likelihood that it will work depends on physics, and on > Rossi's skill. > > I agree this boosts Rossi's credibility. The actual EFORSK report was a > bigger boost, but this helps. I look forward to the overview in this > month's edition of the "Perspectives." This is good for cold fusion. > > - Jed > >
