*There is a long standing century’s long war staring with whale oil vs.
kerosene going on between various segments of the energy market. Each
segment has a list of propaganda weapons that it uses to undercut its
competition. In the end, it all boils down to market share and money. *

* *

*The fossil fuel segment undercuts nuclear energy based on radiation, the
dangers of nuclear waste, cost, melt down danger, the uranium depleted
future, and so on.*

* *

*Nuclear undercuts fossil fuels with global warming, water pollution as a
product of fracking, radiation caused by coal burning, oil spills fouling
the oceans.*

* *

*Nuclear and fossil fuels, undercut wind energy through grid problems,
intermittency, high energy invested again energy gain.*

* *

*Solar is undercut by cloudy days, high costs, high land use and long dark
nights. *

* *

*LENR is being attacked in like manor, but in a more unfocused way because
few attackers know how LENR really works. *

* *

*The will be an attempt to connect LENR with the nuclear power attack
venue, to make use of all the nuclear propaganda.*

* *

*There will eventually be a reach for the nuclear weapons connection as
related to LENR.*

* *

*The LENR vs. LENR+ debate is a microcosm of the energy wars reflected
inside the LENR theorist community.*

* *

*Such debate is a reflection of the age old struggle for dominance that
goes back to the horse and buggy vs. the automobile debate.*

* *

*The way to respond to this certain adversarial situation going forward is
to perfect the LENR energy wars arguments against the energy competition. *

* *

*These energy wars are essentially a political battle and as such the back
and forth dialog must be prepared for and carried out with speed, gleeful
enthusiasm, and untiring perseverance.*

* *

* *


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote:

> and what have I understood from the answers. It is about LENR and
> scientism, the essence is that scientism can ignore me because I am
> still isolated and harmless to the dominant ideas. I am patient and
> stubborn but  at my age patience has to be interpreted in special ways.
>
> Independently from what I can achieve this dispute is a long term problem.
> Please read this essay just from curiosity- to see how broad the spectrum
> of opinions can be.
> I apologize to the nice and generous readers who have helped me indee I
> have not mentioned names as a general rule- trying to protect them
> from being connected to (anti)scientific blasphemies even if I take full
> responsibility
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>

Reply via email to