Hi Dave,
We are very much on the same page and I see in another thread
where you are also thinking about how the frequency division scales with size
of the bulk gas loaded in the lattice and the need for these cavities to
contain resonators of the same frequency… and I do have a conjecture… where the
20% threshold comes into play. I see the lock step motion of the gas loaded
lattice modifying the conductive-nano geometry of the cavities and therefore
varying the static value of Casimir force. As far as all the resonators
having the same resonant frequency this may be a case of the 20% threshold and
consistent geometries of nao powder or skeletal catalyst cavities where gases
manage to form a 20% population of the same fractional values..1/2 thru 1/137
which would then quickly push nearly all the other resonators to this common
fractional value. The fractional values then vary at some harmonic of the
lockstep between this dominant slaved fractional value and the new values that
random motion and changes in the cavity geometry are trying to induce locally..
making the fractional hydrogen endlessly contract and expand at this common
slaved frequency.
I don’t feel the frequency keeps scaling down at 1/n.. the frequency shifted
balmer lines claimed by Mills and I believe later validated are pretty
consistent. The initial harmonic of the lock step that produces a change in
fractional values of hydrogen in the cavity is going to be the most powerful
linkage and as you double and triple the number of gas atoms loaded in the
external lattice I don’t see this affecting the frequency of the lock step. It
should slowly divide the energy as you proposed…energy put into a single
resonator should slowly disperse to the entire population all in phase.
From: David Roberson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 11:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:ENTANGLEMENT THRESHOLDS, bulk loading and Frequency
division ..oh my
This is very much along the line of what I was just thinking. The base allows
coupling among many high Q resonators. Begin with one moving and I bet you
eventually find all of them in sync and at the same level of motion which is
far smaller than the initial one. Of course, this is very dependent upon them
being tuned to the same frequency. If they are mistuned, then the amplitudes
would vary as well as the phase of the motion I suspect.
It is not clear why the motion of the base would not be at the same frequency
as the resonances. Non linear systems do exhibit this sort of behavior on
occasions, but this system appears to be mainly linear. However, If the motion
of the pendulums is large then harmonic non linearities might creep in due to
the return force for each pendulum being determined by the sine of the
displacement.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Roarty, Francis X
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Wed, Jun 12, 2013 9:41 am
Subject: [Vo]:ENTANGLEMENT THRESHOLDS, bulk loading and Frequency division ..oh
my
Axil’s citation regarding 32 out of sync metronomes end up synchronizing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqFc4wriBvE provides a lot of insight on
entanglement threshold, did you note how the platform on which all the
metronomes rested was free to move and that the pendulums were all aligned to
swing on the same axis.. I think the random orientation of Casimir geometries /
fractional orbits inside the cavity side steps this need for a common direction
of motion by instead contracting or expanding the fractional hydrogens ground
state with the same result of synchronization. I have seen animations of
hydrogen loading becoming lock stepped after a certain loading threshold is
achieved so it isn’t a reach to compare this bulk motion to the metronome
platform. In the video you clearly see that the metronome platform has a small
motion that must be a sub harmonic of the metronome frequency such that it adds
or steals a tiny amount of motion each cycle unless they are in phase… perhaps
1/ # of metronomes? In the same way the contracting and expanding of the
fractional states is achieved to synchronize your pet theory of whatever you
feel comes next :_)
Fran
