It gave them temporary additional Brane power, which decayed over time into
sub atomic particles like the Soviet Union


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Roger Bird <[email protected]> wrote:

> Does this imply that the Tunguska event caused the idiocy of the Soviet
> Union, or set the stage for it.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:07 AM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Our atmosphere is basically Nitrogen(N2), Oxygen(O2) and Water
>> Vapor(H2O).  I believe the nuclei(vacuum energy) of that Tunguska Brane
>> orbited through the Earth and jet streams for months afterward and ionized
>> all of the molecules I mentioned previously, Creating NH3 and NH4NO3, O3,
>> NOx and such.  It is the great ionizer and condenser of all matter and is
>> at the heart of LENR.
>>
>> I have also been studying the dark ages and it appears something similar
>> happened to the atmosphere back then in addition to the rampant disease
>> that spread, lots of fireballs, foul air, floods, etc killing tens of
>> millions across Europe and Asia.  I talked with the Professor/Author of one
>> of the books that imply a comet or other celestial object(s) was a trigger,
>> not to say that the opportunistic plague did not contribute.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Baillie
>> Upon examining the tree-ring record, Baillie noticed indications of
>> severe environmental downturns around 2354 BC, 1628 BC, 1159 BC, 208 BC,
>> and AD 540. The evidence suggests that these environmental downturns were
>> wide-ranging catastrophic events; the AD 540 event in particular is
>> attested in tree-ring chronologies from 
>> Siberia<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberia>
>>  through Europe <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe> and 
>> North<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_America>
>>  and South America <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_America>. This
>> event coincides with the second largest ammonium signal in the Greenland
>> ice in the last two millennia, the largest being in AD 1014, and both these
>> epochs were accompanied by cometary apparitions. Baillie explains the
>> general absence of mainstream historical references to this event by the
>> fact it was described in terms of biblical metaphors since at that time
>> "Christian beliefs included the dogma that nothing that happens in the
>> heavens could have any conceivable effect on the 
>> Earth."[1]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Baillie#cite_note-1>
>>
>> 1811 also had a 7 year climate downturn after the visit by the Great
>> Comet of 1811 (and the New Madrid Earthquakes in Dec 1811)
>>
>> I don't think our rock and snowball model of the universe works very
>> well.  Something is energetic enough to ionize "inert" molecules.  I think
>> it is the vacuum energy within these energetic "particles"
>>
>> I believe those billions of tons of CME's that miss us, which I think are
>> mostly collapsed matter, end up here collecting dust
>> http://www.universetoday.com/32515/kuiper-belt/
>>
>> And then gradually hit us in the head every once in awhile as they are
>> pulled in to the inner solar system.  These are mostly electromagnetic and
>> gravitational branes spit out from the Sun in my book, which is just a 5
>> dimensional brane herself.
>>
>> I am mostly interested since we will be passing through comet ISON's tail
>> in Jan 2014. Many comet tails do cause meteor showers annually and
>> something "unusual" is expected from ISON.
>> http://www.space.com/20859-comet-ison-new-meteor-shower.html
>>
>> Stewart
>> darkmattersalot.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  Thanks for the citation, Stewart. I was not aware that the Tunguska
>>> event and Younger Dryas had already been connected via ammonia
>>> concentration found in ice cores. And it is most intriguing that a special
>>> type of higher energy event could be responsible for both. They speculate:
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> “An analog of the Haber process with hydrogen contributed by cometary or
>>> surface water, atmospheric nitrogen, high pressures, and possibly catalytic
>>> iron from a comet could in principle produce ammonia…”****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> But the kind of energy necessary to produce the amount of nitrates seen
>>> – is apparently absent. Since there has been no mention of significant
>>> radioactivity – and given there is like to be massive “extra” gain above
>>> the physics of normal atmospheric impact dynamics, then LENR should not be
>>> ruled out as a contributing source of energy for such events.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> I wonder if the recent Russian meteor at Chelyabinsk produced
>>> significant ammonia or other nitrates and if it too contained Lonsdaleite
>>> and nickel? Many hits turn up on google, as expected - but nothing
>>> conclusive that I have seen. ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> A cross-connection between three factors: nitrates in the atmosphere,
>>> Lonsdaleite carbon and nickel in the bolide, and the lack of large debris
>>> evidence (indicative of an atmospheric explosion) would be interesting for
>>> further speculation based on the possibility of how perhaps 10 times more
>>> energy than can otherwise be accounted for. (notice how many times the
>>> estimated of the size of the Chelyabinsk meteor was raised based solely on
>>> the energy, and not the visual evidence).****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> In short, if Chelyabinsk was really that large, there should have been
>>> prior notice in the ongoing surveys, and if it was comparatively small, as
>>> seems to be the case, then the extra energy could have come from a
>>> non-nuclear source involving hydrogen and nano-porosity.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* ChemE Stewart ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> At the time of Tunguska, something also increased the levels of Ammonia
>>> and Ammonium Nitrate in the atmosphere to significant levels as shown in
>>> ice cores.  ****
>>>
>>> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0907/0907.1067.pdf****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> My bet is that the Tunguska "meteorite" had a LENR/vacuum energy core
>>> and was actually a BRANE per M Theory, just like a comet.  They ionize the
>>> air in their surroundings.  If rocks can generate 10-15 megatons (up to
>>> 1000 times Hiroshima) in the atmosphere without hitting anything why do we
>>> need nuclear weapons?****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Stewart****
>>>
>>> darkmattersalot.com****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Story with many implications, real or imaginary:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.nature.com/news/rock-samples-suggest-meteor-caused-tunguska-blast
>>> -1.13163?WT.ec_id=NEWS-20130611<http://www.nature.com/news/rock-samples-suggest-meteor-caused-tunguska-blast%0d%0a-1.13163?WT.ec_id=NEWS-20130611>
>>>
>>> "Researchers from Ukraine say that they have found a smoking gun for the
>>> Tunguska event," and it is a small fragment from an iron-nickel-carbon
>>> meteor that could have caused the half-megaton blast, leaving few traces.
>>> The study is published in Planetary and Space Science.
>>>
>>> Hold on ... there is more... including the possibility of a Rossi/ LENR
>>> connection! <g>
>>>
>>> Aside from the enormity of the blast and the lack large rock debris,
>>> there
>>> is an overlooked factoid - the samples which have been found contain an
>>> exotic form of carbon called Lonsdaleite - which is somewhere between
>>> graphite and diamond ... and can be nanoporous. There has been prior
>>> speculation on carbon - in some exotic form or another, as being part of
>>> the
>>> Rossi secret catalyst... otherwise this Tunguska story is not exactly on
>>> topic.
>>>
>>> This particular form of carbon was found at another special impact site -
>>> which also relates to a pivotal period at the end of the last ice age,
>>> around 11-13 thousand years ago which is steeped in mythology (the
>>> demise of
>>> the Clovis culture, the rise of the Gobekli Tepe culture, Atlantis, the
>>> flood of Noah, etc). Lonsdaleite has been found as nano-crystals
>>> embedded in
>>> iron-nickel and dated to this exact time period at Lake Cutizeo near
>>> Guanajuato, Mexico, supportive of the controversial Younger Dryas impact
>>> hypothesis. That was presumed to be a massive explosion, since melt-glass
>>> from it was found as far away as Syria.
>>>
>>> Lonsdaleite is an allotrope of carbon with a hexagonal lattice. The
>>> crystal
>>> lattice, is harder and stronger than diamond and usually embedded in an
>>> iron-nickel matrix, and there is the important nano-geometry (it is
>>> called
>>> nano-diamond), and the fact that many meteors contain ice, methane and
>>> hydrogen - all of which, taken together with a larger than expected
>>> explosion ...
>>>
>>> hmmm... maybe it is a bit surprising that the Pentagon hasn't taken an
>>> active interest in the HotCat... or maybe they have.
>>>
>>> Jones
>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>>  ** **
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to