Ed,
You are not very good at misdirection, try hard as you might - and you are
fighting a losing battle in trying to wedge an incorrect theory into the
most important LENR experiment out there at present.
My advice is to quit before you are completely embarrassed. You theory works
in some situations, but it does not work for Rossi's results. Get used to
it.
Please acknowledge that you read the Penon report and understand that the
device was completely disassembled after over 4 megawatt hours of heat was
produced, and that no radiation was detected.
How much tritium should have been present - if your theory were to be valid?
Enough that we would no doubt not be hearing from those guys again.
Yet they are still with us and your theory still falls as flat as a pancake,
insofar as Rossi is concerned.
QED. and yes . let's do move on.
Jones
From: Edmund
Apparently Jones, I have to be clearer and more emphatic. Tritium can not be
detected when it is in a container as massive as the E-cat. THIS IS A FACT.
Please at least acknowledge that I might know something about tritium that
you do not. The video only shows that some unknown amount of tritium mixed
with unknown other radioactive elements was detected in an container of
unknown absorption. You are extrapolating this demonstation to conditions
that have no relevance to the demonstration.
I hope this is clear and we can go on to other subjects.
Ed Storms
On Jun 2, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Edmund Storms
Jones, you are simply wrong. I have worked with tritium and I know how it
behaves.
You apparently have not worked with tritium very intuitively, if you cannot
understand this simple video.
It cannot be detected using its Bremsstrahlund unless a huge amount is
present because this radiation is produced at only a small fraction of the
beta and is absorbed very quickly by only a small amount of material in the
case of tritium.
That is not what is being demonstrated before your eyes. Why am I not
surprised that you do not want to acknowledge this?
Ah. is it because you want tritium to be present in the Rossi reactor when
it is not indicated.
The video does not show anything about tritium.
That is a silly comment, and you know it.
We simply do not know or are told what is in the supposed light stick or how
much tritium is present.
Did you take the time to follow up on the specs? It takes about 5 seconds to
find the Wiki site
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium_illumination
To the extent the container holding the tritium containing fluid is thin
enough to pass Bremsstrahlund and generate useful light, the amount of
tritium would be very dangerous if the container broke.
There are safety concerns, and I would not use this product - but that is
not material to the fact that tritium can be detected by its Bremsstrahlung.
If Rossi had produced enough tritium to be detected this way, everyone in
the room would have serious health and legal problems if the tritium got out
of the E-Cat
Then it is a good thing that the Rossi effect produces no tritium! But of
course, it should if your theory was correct for his device - but it is not
correct for the Rossi device. QED
Jones
