The hydrino if it exists may be a result of LENR not a causation.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Frank <[email protected]> wrote: > ** ** ** > > Why do people keep asking to see a hydrino if we know it requires an NAE > to translate to this state? Are they asking to see the gas / powder in > situ? There is no reason to suspect the hydrogen will remain translated > when it exits the lattice although it would be interesting to know if a > dihydrino could retain some fraction of translation apart from the NAE.. > this might even explain some of the Columb weakening proposed for 3 party > collisions where 2 parties are represented by a dihydrino molecule or > “pico” H2. There is also the “sunburn” experienced by Professor Conrads > when he was exposed to Mills powder configured as a plasma lamp.. still no > hydrino but an indirect measurement of the shifted spectrum photons emitted > by hydrino.. this may be as close to proof as you can come if the hydrogen > needs to be in the lattice to translate to this state.**** > > ** ** > > http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/28/28977/1.html [snip]Critics object that > such confirmations cannot be labelled "independent" because BlackLight > Power was either in a consultant role or their laboratory had been used. > Both has been avoided by German physics professor Johannes Conrads. The > plasma researcher had a private interest in this work but the employer he > had worked for for 30 years, the ****Jülich** **Research** **Center****, > feared repercussions if he engaged in experiments. He found an open ear at > ****Bochum** **Ruhr** **University**** provided that no "crazy theories" > were involved. But Mills’ plasma lamp burned. "I very well remember the > sunburn I had the next day," says Thomas Wrubel who was involved in the > experiment. The BlackLight Power reaction produces intense ultraviolet > light. "Such an extreme ultraviolet emission is not expected," Gerrit > Kroesen from the Technical University of Eindhoven comments who is > currently engaged in studying the BlackLight Process himself. "You have to > make very difficult mental bends to explain it." **** > > Conrads and Wrubel tried to get to the bottom of the mysterious light > emission using well-founded and established methods, even modifying the > experiment. For one year they worked on the experiment on and off. But they > never found an explanation for the plasma because "the minimally required > energy was by all the rules not available. We either have a new chemical > reaction we could not nail down or it is something else strange," Wrubel > looks back wondering. For the 2003 > publication<http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0963-0252/12/3/312/>Mills was > added as a co-author because he had supplied the reaction vessel. > Wrubel does not work in research anymore. [/snip]**** > > Fran**** >
