Axil, I agree, this is my take on LENR at higher GeV range in our Brane World...
http://sdsimonson.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/dbrane-316079-image06.jpg Stewart Darkmattersalot.com On Sunday, June 2, 2013, Axil Axil wrote: > "LENR could be a gateway into the theory of everything." > > The central dilemma at the very heart of LENR is what causes nuclear > reactions at low energy levels. > > > > But are the energies generated in LENR low, or are they potentially > gigantic beyond the reach of any possible supercollider. > > > > Grand unification energy is something less than around 10^^16 GeV, Could > LENR produce such high energies. > > > > Well at least the unification of the electroweak forces and the strong > force might someday be possible. > > > > This force unification might be a possibility in view of some kinds of > violent nuclear rearrangement seen in some LENR systems experiments. > > > > To start off with, what causes the nuclei of most elements to fall apart > and reassemble their subatomic parts in new ways? > > > > Two new papers dealing with the nature and workings of the vacuum lend > insight into the LENR question. > > > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.6165.pdf > > > > *The quantum vacuum as the origin of the speed of light* > > > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.3923v1.pdf > > > > *A sum rule for charged elementary particles* > > > > These papers suggest that the nature of the vacuum is defined by > electromagnetic mechanisms revolving around the action of the constant > creation and destruction of virtual dipoles. > > > > The nature of radioactive decay is also driven off the action of the > virtual particle life cycle and its electromagnetic consequences. > > > > These papers also suggest that the nature of space/time can be changed and > controlled by augmentation of this virtual dipole mechanism. > > > > It is generally recognized that the Fine Structure constant (FSC) is not > really constant at all and can vary. > > > If this FSC can be changed by as little as 4% either more or less, the > delicate balance between the strong force and the electromagnetic force > will fatally disrupt the forces inside the nucleus. > > > > A successful LENR system will setup a positive feedback loop that produces > enhanced dipole production caused by enhanced electron tunneling. > > > > If the proper dipole production topology is created, dipole production > begets enhanced electron tunneling and vice versa. In this way, an extreme > dipole EMF field can be concentrated is a localized volume of space. > > > > The extreme dipole EMF fields thus produced gets so strong that the fabric > of the vacuum within this nanoscopic localized volume is distorted to the > point that the nuclei of atoms in that volume become unbalanced. The > greatly enhanced and increased dipole EMF counteracts the actions of the > strong force and the nuclei inside the localized volume bereft of the > strong force will fall apart. The control of this strong force negation > process is possible. Through the control of the dipole production topology, > the amount of nuclear disruption is proportional to the strength of the > dipole field, and this could be adjusted from slight to extreme. > > > > The next consideration to consider is how the dipole force can grow to > such high levels that the resultant EMF can disrupt the internal mechanisms > inside the nucleus. > > > > Each individual dipole is a member of a global mirrored Bose-Einstein > condensate of polaritons and holes in which all the combined dipole EMF is > available to each member of the global dipole ensemble in linear > superposition as a quantum mechanical potential. This EMF is carried by > virtual photons that can be in quantum mechanical linear superposition. > > > > When any given nucleus succumbs to the combined power of the global > entangled dipole force, the superposition of the EMF photons is resolved > and energy of the nuclear breakup is transferred coherently in micro > quantities to the other members of the dipole ensemble. > > > > The BEC is immediately reestablished over the disrupted nucleus within the > local volume of dipole EMF influence and the superpositions of potential > nuclear disintegrations are restored globally throughout the system. > > > > Reference: > > > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1261v1 > > > > *Rydberg excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate* > > > > Any nuclear reaction that produces a gamma that occurs in a BEC will > undergo frequency reduction based on the super-atom formula > > > > Gamma frequency = Square root (Number of BEC atoms)(Thermalized frequency) > > > > The frequency of the gamma will be shared by N BEC member atoms. > > > > To conclude this discussion with an example, the BEC of positive mirrored > ions in the dipole ensemble can be considered a huge positive particle > effectively a billion times larger than a proton. But this super-positive > particle is only a few nanomenters away from a give nucleus. This short > distance exposes the localized linear volume to the full force of the EMF. > That unfortunate nucleus would experience powerful disruptive EMF charge > amplification which would make the space/time in the local nano-volume that > the nucleus lived in a killing field for the nuclear forces that hold the > nucleus together. > > > > If the BEC is scalable, how powerful can a Entangled Dipole EMF become? I > can’t wait to find out. > > > > Reference: > > > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.0135v1.pdf > > > > Is* quantum linear superposition an exact principle of nature?* >
