[Sent to Y.Y. This is not important. Sorry to be so obsessive.]
Yamali Yamali <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
So you're not basing the confidence that an EE would find fraud
impossible not on the report or on what Hartman and Essen said
afterwards but primarily on an idealized version of what you believe
they should have done to exclude fraud.
No, I am basing it on what they said in the report, and also afterwards
when they described lifting up the control box to confirm it does not
hold a battery, and checking the equipment stand to be sure it is not
charged.
Also I'm not talking about an idealized version of a scientist or an
electrician. I'm talking about every scientist electrician who has ever
lived after Edison. The kinds of tricks described by Cude with two wires
under the insulation could not fool any of them. Or me, for that matter.
The other tricks described by Cude a such as using a diode to make 900 W
of electricity look like 300 W are impossible.
Or did they say anywhere in the paper that they actually cut the
wires themselves? I couldn't find anything about it.
It would not make any difference who cuts the wires. As long as they
have eyes and can see where the wires go they can confirm this trick is
not being used.
What are you imagining? Do you suppose they handed the voltage probes to
Rossi, turned their backs and said: "Please attach this wherever you
like. We promise we will not look." Seriously, does that sound
plausible? Have you ever met a scientist or electrician who would do that?
. . . but I wouldn't be surprised if the camera thing wasn't their
idea at all but Rossi's requirement in order to make sure that they
wouldn't investigate his "industrial secret waveform" . . .
No, it was their idea. Also their camera and their video recording.
Unless Rossi got a copy this would not help him prevent them from
investigating things when he was not there.
- Jed
