Josh, your entire theory will be shot if you acknowledge that the COP is greater than 1. Are you now ready to accept this condition?
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Cude <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, May 31, 2013 3:22 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:new hypothesis to confute regarding input energy in Ecat test On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: My guess is that he is designing for industrial applications. It's not gonna be useful for industrial purposes with a COP of 3; remember the electricity was made with an efficiency of 1/3. It's gonna have to be self-sustaining. I hardly think he's looking at the final version of the power supply when the ecat is still completely inadequate. You're grasping.
