Nope. Had you been paying attention to the interviews with the testers, you would have read that quote as #7 in a list of 7. As for the Rossi quote, this has also been widespread. You couldn't make this stuff up. And I didn't; I simply repeated written quotes.
As for motives, you seem to miss the obvious one, but I won't speculate about it publicly. Lord knows, that might be "libellous". Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: Jed Rothwell To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:28 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into question Andrew <[email protected]> wrote: Rossi: The experimenters were free to use any test equipment of their choosing. Testers: That depends on Prof. Levi, who specifies the instrumentation. Yup, ethical as all get out. This seems to be a straight out assertion that Levi is lying, and that he is in cahoots with Rossi. If that is your opinion you should say so. I think that borders on libel. I suggest you refrain from saying things like that in this forum, unless you have some evidence. Rossi has done so many odd things he makes anyone uncomfortable. It is hardly libelous to point out that he is controversial and has been in trouble with the law. But Levi has not done anything or said anything suspicious. You are saying, in effect, that a professor is deliberately destroying his own reputation, in a way that will certainly be discovered, with no possible benefit or profit. This seems unlikely to me. - Jed
