On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 09:12:56AM -0400, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Vorl Bek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > While I enjoy a True Believer > > site as much as anyone, after a while it is like eating nothing > > but dessert - you need some meat and potatoes in the form of > > articulate skeptics. > > > > If you think there is merit to a skeptical point of view, why don't you > write about it?
Which would be in violation of Rule 2, as well. It seems that anything (to put it politely) is on-topic here but a critical view on LENR. That pushes the list into non-worthwhile territory for me as well.
