> > Do you have any idea whether the inactive one would frequently be made > active by variations in display setttings?
Not very likely. There are various difficulties, not that it should stop you but you should be aware of them. Aetheric energy can couple over large distances, additionally it can remain in an area or an object once disturbed. Coupling over large distances can occur sometimes when there is resonance between 2 similar things, much like radio's tuned to resonance, or the aforementioned twin effect. So even if one image is inactive, if it is too close it may 'couple' and take energy from the active one. Not that it can't be studied in such ways successfully, but ignoring the way it functions serves the likes of Randi, but it does not serve genuine interest in reclaiming extraordinary science from the fringe. John On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:08 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, John Berry <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:57 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> So, let me ask you again for an acceptable control experiment but in >>> different terms: >>> >>> What sort of picture does your theory predict will be very similar to >>> the experimental treatment picture, but lack the essential aspects that >>> produce the amplification of the placebo, or other hypothesized effect? >>> >> >> Well I did already post an image that has 2 very similar 'devices', one >> which works well and another that is almost lifeless, just split them up. >> >> http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/9209/activeandinactive.png >> >> > Thanks! > > That's a good start. > > Do you have any idea whether the inactive one would frequently be made > active by variations in display setttings? > > >
