NAE is not an acronym I am familiar with. I see it can mean nuclear active environment.
Have you tried the image? On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > John, I never left the path..perhaps this makes me a nutty troll but > didn’t Tesla already treat this like an electrical science, He proposed > that super high voltages could stiffen or “solidify” the ether. If I recall > the story correctly Lorentzian theory was never proven wrong only less > elegant than Einstein’s but with equivalent results and later in life > Einstein did embrace ether theory. Casimir theory is an example of this > where the results can be adequately explained from either perspective and > when it comes down to brass tacks ..does it really matter which theory you > choose? I choose ether theory because it is easy to visualize and requires > less math skill to make a point. I like the Haisch - Rueda example of a > car accelerating into a rainstorm increasing the pressure and resistance to > forward motion with acceleration as being equivalent to acceleration > through the ether..approach C and the pressure increases at a Pythagorean > rate between time and space pushing the vector up from zero toward 90 > degrees on the time axis [time dilation occurs in positive direction –slows > from our perspective].. What IMHO is occurring in these NAE –and it agrees > with the Naudt’s paper which redefines the hydrino as “relativistic” > hydrogen, is that the “rain” in the Haisch-Rueda experiment which defines > the “baseline” of rainfall- ether at zero velocity is actually capable of > being “shielded” at the nano scale.. Casimir plates like all macro world > matter experience ether intersecting our plane at 90 degrees from all > spatial directions but can take advantage of conduction and geometry to > shield a tiny cavity where the “pressure” as Puthoff would call it is > reduced.. putting the passengers in that car at a lower pressure than what > we consider the baseline in the macro world.. the hydrogen atoms are those > passengers and do not need to accelerate to achieve relativistic > effects..instead of compressing the rainfall by accelerating the NAE is > simply suppressing the rainfall – much easier to do without any energy > requirements other than to build the geometry in opposition to stiction > forces. Of course any hydrogen migrating in and out of these NAE cavities > will translate back and forth through different inertial frames and gain > nothing without some asymmetrical process that opposes the migration in one > direction vs the other..allowing us to tap the translation for energy as if > the car was changing velocities… also note that the vector for occupants of > this NAE – car is now toward negative 90 degrees and it is we who appear > to slow down from dilation from the perspective of the occupants in this > lower pressure environment..**** > > Regards**** > > Fran**** > > ** ** > > *From:* John Berry [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 16, 2013 3:21 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Any experimenters, aether theorists here?**** > > ** ** > > I have been in Vo's ugly nest of believers for a very long time.**** > > ** ** > > I think in general a more accurate sentence might be a nest > of skeptics and jaded ex-believers (oh, and some nuts and trolls, and nutty > trolls).**** > > ** ** > > Anyway I have some developments in the direction of influencing the aether > sufficient to make it felt by most people.**** > > ** ** > > My goal is to make this into a science, not dissimilar too electrical > engineering.**** > > And I am hoping to gain suggestions and other intput, and since this is > very easy to experiment with some may wish to collaborate.**** > > ** ** > > I can probably prove the reality of this to anyone interested with the > investment of only 2-3 minutes and no materials needed.**** > > ** ** > > This is the science of the future (and perhaps the past) that will provide > Free Energy, Antigravity and a Star Trek level technology in general.**** > > ** ** > > Anyone want to take the path less traveled?**** > > ** ** > > John**** > > ** ** >
