I once did some calculation with the volume of the wire, it seems that at 14Watts of output, you have an output equivalent of the same volume in gasoline burned every 2 minutes. It's an amazing quantity of energy for such small volume. And gasoline surely holds much more energy/volume than a lattice with loaded hydrogen. If a lattice could hold so much energy, our problems with urban pollution would be long solved... and also, rockets would be much cheaper and we would be colonizing mars for decades already.
So, what we have here today either can be only ascribed to an error of measurement, since today's readings is already enormous, or is nuclear or something else weird. 2012/12/13 Mark Gibbs <[email protected]> > Why not? > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I should say percentage of loading does not appear to be an issue. >> >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > With NiH loading is not an issue. It seems we have two totally >> > different LENR reactions occuring. Are they based on the same >> > physics? Maybe yes, maybe no. >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Yes, McKubre takes the endothermic loading and exothermic off loading >> >> into his calculations in his work at SRI. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Mark Gibbs <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Something I haven't seen any discussion about is the amount of energy >> >>> required to load materials with hydrogen to be used in these various >> LENR/CF >> >>> devices. If that energy is taken into account, are the claims of >> excess >> >>> energy from the operation of the devices still valid? >> >>> >> >>> [mg] >> >> > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
