Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]> wrote:
> In an update posted by Daniele Passerini on his 22passi blog, Ubaldo > Mastromatteo, main author of this Celani effect replication at STM labs, > forwarded a graph showing a [one of many?] calibration run: > > http://www.22passi.it/pirelli/**Grafico%20calibrazione%20test%** > 20per%20Celani.pdf<http://www.22passi.it/pirelli/Grafico%20calibrazione%20test%20per%20Celani.pdf> > > In short, by using different testing conditions which make the active wire > "inert", they obtained a linear relationship of output power with > temperature. Wire performance under conditions which make it "active" is > then compared to this linear trend curve fit. > Those are the same data points shown in the other graph. So, in other words, they are using the active wire at temperatures below where the effect turns on, and this is their inert or blank calibration. That's not a good method, in my opinion. They need to try a fully inert wire made from another substance, calibrating through the full range of temperatures that the active wire exposed to. - Jed
