Regarding radiation:

The Minnesota team is using a fused quartz tube. Since Quartz glass is more
transparent to the infrared wavelengths than borosilicate glass, the cell is
losing a significant amount of the heat energy compared to Celani because
Celani is using a borosilicate tube.

 

http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/105-quartz-vs-pyrex-glass-conclu
sions

 

Regarding convection:

The heat conductivity of Hydrogen gas doesn’t change much at the pressure
used in the cell. It’s a matter only of a few percent.

 

If the MFMP team changes the quartz tube to a borosilicate tube (or even
better SS tube paint in black), then the question will be solved.

 

Celani doesn’t have this problem.

 

It’s not a bad news in itself. It is just an evolution/reflexion in their
quest for the replication of Celani’s effect.

Arnaud

  _____  

From: Jeff Berkowitz [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: dimanche 2 décembre 2012 08:02
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Vo]:Important news from HUG team in Minnesota

 

It's bad news, but it's important.

 

In short, the contention now is that Celani did not account for effect of
pressure changes within the cell. Reducing the gas pressure reduces the
thermal conductivity of the gas. This reduces the temperature of cell
components like the metal flanges that are mostly heated by the gas. 

 

So at lower gas pressure, the flanges don't get as hot and so don't radiate
away as much heat. But the electrical heating is constant, so measured
temperatures at other points in the cell must rise. HUG is contending that
this pressure-modulated rise in temperature elsewhere in the cell is what
Celani measured as excess heat.

 

http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/163-a-partial-explaination

 

Jeff

 

Reply via email to