I agree Mark. All of the evidence should be openly discussed without filtering. I suspect that it is normal for the "experts" to push their views of reality upon us ignorant masses. How would anyone except for the experts be capable of finding the truth hidden under so many loose rocks? Also, it would be difficult to construct a coherent time line which has more holes than materials if serious filtering is not used.
In my estimate this filtering procedure is merely a technique used to cover the lack of knowledge. What is so wrong with stating that it is not known at this time versus pretending to have all of the important answers? It would even be advantageous for us as a whole if the many weakly supported concepts were listed somewhere in a public location so that anyone could give them thought. For example, I would love to know where the major holes are in quantum theory. I am confident that there are very many to consider. The more these issues are discussed, the quicker solutions will be uncovered. Dave -----Original Message----- From: MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Nov 27, 2012 1:08 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Time travelling at the movies Very interesting Terry!! And there is much more evidence of anomalous 'history' about the human species and its presence on the planet. Read "Forbidden Archeology" or the condensed version, "Hidden History of the Human Race" This is a comment from the Amazon.com page on Hidden History... and this is from a geologist! ------------------------------------------------ In a sentence: If even a small part of this is true it turns evolution on its ear. I was given this book by a friend for no particular reason and immediately scoffed at it. As a geologist, I had learned quite a bit about evolution and the filtered information regarding the "accepted" evidence. I eventually started reading it and what I read in this book makes my hair stand on end. The lack of documentation regarding "true" discoveries of human antiquity by the elite of archeology and anthropology is as astounding as the categorical dismissal of other evidence is deplorable. To dismiss evidence of greater antiquity of man because it doesn't fit existing data and "just can't be" is a tragedy of the ages. Makes me wonder how much of this goes on in my own profession. ------------------------------------------------ The real point is that 'ALL' of the evidence should be openly displayed and discussed and studied, not just what some elite scholar or museum administrator thinks we should see. Also more support for how LENR was suppressed... it's really the norm for science when the evidence is way outside the paradigm. -Mark
