>From Jones: ...
> Krivit, like it or not - has the most credibility in the field, since > Sterling is deemed as way too gullible, and the others have been mostly "me > too" with a few exceptions ... even if SK's standards are not sufficient for > us, here on vortex. It seems to me that Mr. Krivit has attempted to present himself as an investigative reporter cutting through all the bull sh*t in order to get to the nittygritty of controversial subjects. The problem with this portrayal is when Mr. Krivit at one point deliberately portrayed an obviously controversial individual like Rossi in terms of someone who can't think clearly by focusing on Rossi's hesitant command of the English language (such as by quoting his broken phrases verbatum) and In my view Krivit's portrayal of himself leaves something to be desired. IMHO, Krivit showed me someone who has not yet acquired the capacity to cut through some of his own bull sh*t, let alone the bull sh*t of others. Keep in mind that we all have personal bull sh*t to contend with. It's not as if Mr. Krivit has tons of it and the rest of us don't, including myself. That is clearly not the case. With that said, I'd read NET for free. > I just hope that individuals who cannot afford the service can get fairly > rapid access to the same information - which of course they can, if they can > wait a day or two. It's all about perceived value, including time. Me too. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
