Good question Jojo Jaro.
Lets say there is a log on the road. In this analogy the log represents the short range strong force. You are bind and you drive over the log. Crash! You know you drover over the log because you heard the crash. Likewise when a nucleon passes over the electrostatic potential barrier there is a crash, however, this time a gamma ray, not sound, is emitted. Lets say you are walking blind and step over the log. You never knew it was there. No crash. Like wise if the range of the strong nuclear force exceeds that of the Columbic energy will pass smoothly over the potential barrier. This is the only way a nuclear reaction can progress without emission. Storm's does not see or appreciate this. It is the main point Edmond. If the range of the strong nuclear force increased matter would be crushed out of existence. It can't be this. The dynamic spin orbit force can increase to the dimensions of a cluster without crushing matter out of existence. It is expelled like the magnetic force is expelled from a superconductor. The electromagnetic analogy works well with this process. Wha lah the spin orbit force reaches through the Coulombic barrier and tens to act on a cluster of nucleons. To me its obvious. This solution also leads to a classical understanding of the quantum condition. See the control of the natural forces. http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals-Papers/Author/913/Frank,%20Znidarsic%20(new) Frank Znidarsic -----Original Message----- From: fznidarsic <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Aug 24, 2012 11:14 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:It's fission Good question Jojo Jaro. The spin orbit force is the dynamic component of the strong nuclear force. It is the magnetic component of the strong force, however, it is not of electromagnetic origin. The electromagnetic magnetic force is not conserved and can increase under certain conditions. With electromagnetic "magnetic" soft iron is does the trick. The magnetic component of the strong force is called the spin orbit force. It is likewise not conserved. Under certain dynamic conditions it can increase in range and strength. It tends to filp neutrons and protons into pairs. This flipping action drives the weak force and tends to produce stable elements. These elements have approximately equal numbers of protons and neutrons. It like a bunch of compasses sitting together. Half will point up and half will point down. Now what is the condition required to increase the strength of the spin orbit force. Its dynamic vibration. Contrary to Storm's video, there is a formula. It's velocity = 1,094,00 meters/second = frequency times wavelength Frank Znidarsic -----Original Message----- From: Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Aug 24, 2012 6:38 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:It's fission Frank, how does one achieve this nucleon flipping? Give me something that I can test experimentally. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 5:48 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:It's fission Not fusion not fission. It is nucleon flipping due to an greatly increased range and strength of the strong nuclear spin orbit force. Frank Znidarsic -----Original Message----- From: Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Aug 24, 2012 4:52 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:It's fission Never mind, I opened my mouth before I had the chance to read and comprehend what you are saying. I do that many times in my excitement. I'm an idiot. So, you are hypothesizing fission of Nickel? Wouldn't that be unlikely considering that nickel is such a stable element? What would be the fission reaction paths ending up with these elements. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Jojo Jaro To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 4:09 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:It's fission Can you hypothesize a starting element that would produce these elements via fission? Ni???? Jojo PS. On a lighter note, I am glad that you view my theory and explanation to be sufficiently credible for you to put it in league with Ed Storms. Comparing my theory with DGT is fair and proper, as both theories are vaporware - no experimental basis at all. But comparing me with Ed Storms is a great honor indeed. Frankly, this idea of CNTs and Charge accumulation on 1D structures, predominantly came from insights I got from Ed Storms and You. So, it's not really MY theory. It's mostly yours. But I'll be glad if someone would give my theory a sanity check. Heck, as long as we get LENR and kick out the ragheads from our lives, I don't care where or who comes up with it. Being the inventor of Commercial LENR would only serve to complicate my life. Last thing I need is for the ragheads and the Illuminati to paint a big Bullseye on my back. ----- Original Message ----- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 3:37 AM Subject: [Vo]:It's fission http://defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1419 Defkalion GT stated On the other hand, the trace of Li, Bi and B in ICPMS analysis of NAE after the reactions/interactions in Hyperion reactors, is a strong evidence of nucleosynthesis of light elements (H to B), relating gamma absorption and further heat energy production. It is very difficult to produce of Li, Bi and B through nucleosynthesis. These elements are rare throughout the solar system and universe because they are poorly synthesized by fusion in both the Big Bang and also in stars. The concept of element build up from solely hydrogen that is held by DGTG, Ed Storms, and JoJo may be flawed. The method of production of these light elements in LENR may well derive from fission of a heavy element into multiple light elements. Fission is much more energy productive as a nuclear process. A heavy metal like nickel might be an absolute requirement to get transmutation of light elements and nuclear heat production to fly. Depending on element atomic weight build up from just hydrogen might not work. In addition, the production of helium(He4) may be a result of alpha decay and not fusion. Cheers: Axil
