The Rice/Kim paper below gives a pretty good introduction to the DDL or Deep Dirac Layer (put forth by Maly and Va'vra in Fusion Technology). Rice/Kim et al make a valiant effort to disprove, or at least cast doubt on the reality of the DDL, but the underlying assumptions in eq. 9,10,11 have problems of their own.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RiceRAcommentsona.pdf Curiously Rice/Kim et al do not mention Miley & Holmlid's conception of IRH, or Inverted Rydberg Hydrogen. But they do mention Mills conception of deeply redundant ground states, but not accurately. At any rate - the main point of all this is the similarity of Mills, Miley & Holmlid and Maly & Va'vra - at least when all of their suggestions are taken together and mashed, so to speak; making a putative case for the identity of so-called dark matter. Perhaps one must cherry-pick amongst them to get the best details, but there seems to be something very intuitive in this correlation of dense-hydrogen to dark matter. All of them, and Mills is first in the chronology IIRC, suggest that this dense state of hydrogen can be the "ash" of reactions such as those which occur in the corona of our sun and most other starts, and which the end product consists of tightly bound hydrogen atoms with an extremely tight orbital. This has appeal in being the best way to account for the missing mass (dark matter) of the universe, since that mass is really nothing new at all, but is in effect another form of hydrogen. The electron orbit radius of the DDL is only ~ 5 fm. I mention this today since the group has been graced by the presence of the honorable Mark Gibbs, who may be looking for every science journalist's dream story - to not just report the little incremental advances in science - but to pick a winner of major importance and deep significance. A game changer. Jones
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
