In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:09:52 -0400: Hi, [snip] >They are proposed to range from the largest of 6.6 billion solar masses >down to 23 micrograms, the planck mass, about a grain of sand, but >collapsed. I propose that they are not really "stable" they are always >emitting some form of Ultra Low Momentum Radiation (see I can event my own >terms also!) Whenever they come close enough to external matter or are >fed energy of any kind they instaneously convert that matter to energy and >evaporate it back to their environment, going back to a stable >thermodynamic state. > >Large black holes belch higher levels of radiation when they consume a star >or other matter that comes close enough all I am saying is that their >babies do the same. [snip] What I had in mind was a formula for the rate at which Hawking radiation causes it to evaporate, which is apparently size dependant. Other factors to take into consideration are that a neutral black hole would oscillate back and forth through the planet, so in order to remain stuck in a lattice, it would have to be charged. Furthermore, the resulting chemical binding forces would need to at least counteract the gravitational force trying to draw it to the center of the Earth, so that would place a limit on the mass.
Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
