Akira, According to my theory, at the moment the hydrogen collapses in a void or crack (singularity), you should get an instant burst of low level Hawking Radiation(full spectrum) since quantum singularities are very hot to start with and they will immediately evaporate matter down near local steady state thermodynamic and spatial equilibrium conditions within a void or crack in the lattice. If/once it settles down within a void it then will start slowly consuming hydrogen gas that it pulls gas matter into the void from outside and will continue emitting very low levels of radiation and heat. According to theory, some of this radiation is quarks and gluons and I am not sure these will register on your devices. Over time, the Hawking radiation and or collapse of nearby matter will create local/brittleness within the lattice at which point any internal collapse will create another immediate and local instability and burst of energy at which point it will come to a new thermodynamic equilibrium point. This will go one until a point at which enough matter is consumed that their is a complete collapse of the wire. Singularities can create temperature inversions as their surface area changes and they consume more/gas matter than they evaporate. Over time this should balance out at the end of the universe.
These singularities will act as a quantum heat pump, pulling in matter from hydrogen or the lattice (or any other matter) and rewarding you with heat and radiation, much of it as heat. The Rohner/Papp video that shows a coil sucking gas from a reactor vessel and balloon is the same effect. The singularities have built up on the inside surface of the coil (he mentions that the surface has changed and sticks to the cyclinder) with a voltage and are acting as a quantum heat pump pulling in gas matter and liberating heat trying to achieve equilibrium in their environment. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlgiwB8V4sc According to my theory, collapsed matter generates radiation and appear to exists in nature within cracks and voids of metals and rocks of the earth and is probably concentrated in the earth at the core, away from life. I believe it is the singularity(s) themselves that are more dangerous than the low level radiation. As you can see it is devouring the lattice with primary collapse, hawking radiation and some fission and fusion events as well as probably some chemical events from the heat release. Be careful of getting a singularity on/in you which will be hard to do since they are invisible. According to theory a singularity might be as small as 22 micro grams at planck length, about like a grain of sand but will be completely invisible. They might even be smaller based upon actual quantum gravity effects. Gravity wants to take it to the earth and dispose of it at the center where it safetly produces heat for the earth. Stewart On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Akira Shirakawa <[email protected] > wrote: > On 2012-08-17 16:43, Peter Gluck wrote: > >> According to Piantelli and to Defkalion. Ni does not work at all with >> deuterium, Why it works (?) here is a good/bad question. >> > > Celani reported strange results with Deuterium too (with his treated > nanostructured ISOTAN44 wires). It works, but poorly compared to Hydrogen. > See here, slide 45: > > http://www.22passi.it/**downloads/Celani_ICCF17_**Trasp3.pdf<http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Celani_ICCF17_Trasp3.pdf> > > His observations on Deuterium use: > > 21) After D2 intake, we increased, as usual, the temperature by power to >> the inert wire. The absorption was really of small amount. >> >> 22) We observed, for the first time in our experimentation with such kind >> of materials, some X (and/or gamma emission), coming-out from the reactor >> during the increasing of the temperature from about 100°C to 160°C. We used >> a NaI(Tl) detector, energy range 25-2000keV used as counter (safety >> purposes), not as spectrometer. Total time of such emission was about 600s >> and clearly detectable, burst like. >> >> 23) About thermal anomalies, we observed, very surprising, that the >> response was endothermic, not eso-thermic. The second day the system >> crossed the zero line and later become clearly eso-thermic. Similar effects >> were reported also by A. Takahashi and A. Kitamura. >> >> 24) After about 350000s from the beginning of D2 intake the temperature >> abruptly increased and the wire was broken. We observed that the pressure >> decreased, because some problems to the reactor gas tight, but at times of >> 80000s before. The SEM observations showed fusion of a large piece of wire. >> The shape was like a ball. Further analyses are in progress. >> > > Cheers, > S.A. > >
