What to believe about Rossi? More important perhaps is what to believe about his generators but it is not easy to make a clear distinction. I believe that Rossi has systematically and deliberately tried to to "improve" his experimental results, however (I repeat this) he has tried to convince the public that 2 = 4, not that 0 = 2 and it is a great difference between these. I think now that exactly when I was most convinced that Rossi is lying in the ugiest mode, he was telling the truth or almost the truth, specifically: a) when he told that his process is complete different from Piantelli's; b) when he has stated repeatedly that for developing his LENR he cannot learn from any of the existing LENR's systems. I believe that Rossi has indeed invented some functional additives thta change the process in a radical mode. Further I think his LENR is really at least 100X more intense than any other, say, classical LENRs, I think Rossi has *discovered, invenbted LENR+* I think that Defkalion has a much better engineering expertise and team than Rossi and a far superior management strategy. I think that DGT is the champion of LENR+. We have to wait at least to the end of the year to get some realistic info about the Ecat, however Defkalion will shows us a working prototype of Hyperion at mid-year and that's not far. I think what I say here will not believed or taken in consideration. We have to wait only 2-3 months to see that I am right. Peter
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > This may be a duplicate posting. There are several web sites with similar > names. I do not remember which is officially representing Rossi and which > is . . . an echo chamber. Anyway, see: > > http://ecat.com/news/news-update-from-andrea-rossi-and-ecat-com-in-may > > Nice illustration. > > Who knows what to believe? When Rossi talks about his business I take > everything not with a grain of salt, but with a ton of salt. Still, I have > no other information that contradicts this, and no particular reason not to > believe it. His business arrangements are not relevant to his technical > claims. Fortunately, some of his technical claims have been independently > confirmed by Ampenergo and others. > > I was disappointed in the quality of the calorimeter and other equipment > in the photos from Defkalion. I have not seen definitive proof that they > have excess heat. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
