In a sense, the _scientific_ source of the cold fusion debacle was a conflict over _interpretation_ of existing theory. When establishment scientists repeated their catechisms that "it flies in the face of theory", not only were they denying the cardinal rule of science, which is that theory is subordinate to experiment, but they were denying their own theories by imposing upon them simplifying _interpretations_ from which they drew the unsound conclusion that "it flies in the face of theory".
Of course, the presence of a simulation tool that allows _numeric_ interpretation of the most fundamental physical theories will not concern them, since they are not truly concerned with _science_. What this tool _will_ do is allow cold fusion _theorists_ to cease their continual babbling and get down to some serious work. On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe they will discover my megahertz-meter relationship. > > Frank > > ensed matter and ultra-cold atoms. >
