The FFG article is too stupid for words. I don't get it that Allen does
not understand how he is being used like a prostitute.
They showed ueber-skeptic Stirling Allen and three other *scientists*
(experienced electronics technicians) that it worked using the following
high-end laboratory equipment:
- a two-burner stove, each burner consuming 1 kW (rated power according
to manufacturer)
- a toaster that consumed 850 Watts (rated power)
- a pancake maker that consumes 1 kW (rated power)
- A 40-Watt fan (rated power)
Now even Stirling Allen must understand that rated power doesn't say too
much. Most of these things have thermostats. So even if they
continuously made pancakes, which he does not tell anything about, they
must not be taking their rated power all of the time.
There is no mention of any real measuring equipment except for
apparently a voltmeter to measure the battery potential at intervals.
(it doesn't say how exactly they measured this. Easy to crank up the
voltage, e.g. with a joule-thief).
How gullible Allen can be: Allen says in his report that under this load
of 4kW the 2 pcs 12V/102Ah batteries should be fully drained after 35
minutes. That's a good calculation. Already in the next paragraph
however, he has no problem making clear that the number of batteries is
actually 4, but two of them (the 'second bank') are used "to harvest
back-EMF from the "wheel of nature". Ermm.. okay... Allen.. listen..
that doesn't mean they are not full batteries capable of supplying
another 2.4 kWh.
[ BTW The original text mentioned 1020 Ah batteries, which I found
absurd, as they lifted all of them up later in the article, to show
there were no hidden connections. Allen has now fixed that. ]
He has now added a new P.P.S. to the article, right after the original
P.S. that warned naysayers that the SA company was not after money. it says:
For you naysayers who immediately jump to the conclusion that anything
involving "free energy" must be bogus or fraudulent, bear in mind that
this company is not seeking money. In fact they spurn any such inquiries.
*p.p.s. Whoa...*
The company send the following on February 22, 2012 3:48 PM, about 6
hours after we first posted the above story:
I appreciate your enthusiasm but need to pull the reins back a bit.
I mentioned when you were here that we first want to trial with the
corporates. This process needs to go ahead now and we will entertain
licensees thereafter so let's hold off on the discussions with
potential guys for now as we are being flooded and I don't want to
distract from our strategy.....
I feel we an safely ignore this FFG device, just like all other magnet
motors, as Frank is suggesting.
Andre
On 02/23/2012 09:53 AM, [email protected] wrote:
It works the same was as them all. It makes a sharp pulse and feeds
it back into the battery. The pulse confuses the volt meter.
Joseph Newman is the grandfather of this technique and as he says they
probably stole the idea from him.
http://www.josephnewman.com/
Nothing in Maxwell's equations allow for over unity. I believe in
over unity, however, the process must affect the nuclear force.
Frank
