Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: good design, but I think it is not adapted to the need. > your design save energy, but at the cost of investment. > the structure of LENR is that it is investment that cost, not fuel. > > so my vision is that classic water, moderate temperature, will will, > because it will ensure the least total cost > > LENR is really a violent paradigm change in energy management. > we were preparing for starvation, and it is bonanza. . . . >
Yup. Well said. > see the nuclear reactors, working at low temperature for incresed safety > and simplicity... > LENR is even less expensive about consumption. I agree. I was going to make these points. - Jed
