What is Takahashi analogue to the deflated electron?
On Dec 30, 2011, at 13:21, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Your theory is just too similar to what I imagine that should happen in Phase > III that I get confused. You are correct in your stuff, but you don't use > many equations, mostly your intuition. So, I get lost reading your papers. > > Right, to be clear. a-e. Just show me where I can find in your papers. I will > surely read it, because I just could start to figure out anything from you > only when I had a similar idea. > > 2011/12/30 Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net> > What part do you not understand: > > a. the mechanism of trapping of the post fusion nuclear electron > b. the low energy state of the post fusion nuclear electron > c. the mechanism by which the trapped electron absorbs the fusion energy > d. why the fusion energy is not sufficient to eject the post fusion > nuclear electron > e. the ability of the post fusion trapped nuclear electron to radiate > > Just to be clear, I am talking about my theory here, deflation fusion, not > any other. I think these things have been described in my articles, but often > when I look back I find material that was posted but not included in any > article, but which I had assumed was included in an article. Sometimes it > takes me months to find things, and in the interim I think maybe they were > figments of my imagination. > > > On Dec 30, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> I didn't understand this part "from the intermediate nucleus vicinity in >> small increments by a trapped electron." >> >> 2011/12/30 Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net> >> >> On Dec 30, 2011, at 7:21 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: >> >>> Oh, nice! That's why he also congratulated you in that report. I didn't go >>> to the talk or take part in the CMNS list, so I cannot know. I am happy >>> that I got to similar conclusions as you did independently. Several people >>> reaching the same conclusions, in similar ways, is a sign of things going >>> into the right direction. >>> >>> But I am still not sure how to get rid of the gamma rays. >> >> >> You don't have to worry about big gammas if there are none produced. You >> don't have to worry about getting rid of gamma rays if they are released >> from the intermediate nucleus vicinity in small increments by a trapped >> electron. > > Best regards, > > Horace Heffner > http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ > > > > > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
