I agree. By then the necessary control algorithms and sensor choice /
development will be completed and implemented.
AG
On 12/24/2011 4:01 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
It means don't be surprised if he is no longer working with them 6-12
months from now.
harry
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
<aussieguy.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
Rossi has said this theory work is being done by others. What does this have
to do with National Instruments who are working with Rossi and his 1st
customer to implement a better control system for the 1 MW E-Cat plants? I
would suggest the goal is self sustained E-Cat operation, over a wide power
generation range, and that is why the consultant needed to see self sustain
mode during the 1 MW test even if it meant the individual E-Cat modules were
running at 25% of rated output.
AG
On 12/24/2011 1:27 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Earlier this year Rossi made similar glowing remarks about the
professors from Uppsala University.
Is he working with them today? No.
Harry
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
<aussieguy.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516&cpage=15#comment-155608
*
Andrea Rossi
December 23rd, 2011 at 5:04 PM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516&cpage=15#comment-155608>
Dear Jan Srajer:
National Instruments is the best Partner a manufacturer of plants of
high technology can have. We are learning from them, and thanks to
them the 1 MW plant we are finishing for our Customer is growing up
a magnificence. Useless to say, all our plants will be supplied by
the control systems of N.I. We are honoured to be supplied by them.
The most important thing of their working way is that they do not
just supply their technology, but they teach to you to grow up in
its knowledge to make you able to peer-interfacing with them, like
they do not just sell you good fish, but also teach you how to fish,
so that fishing is empowered.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
