On Dec 17, 2011, at 12:00 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
[snip]

This ties in with Alchemy as well, and the very difficult time LENR
scientists had with repeatability... conditions HAVE TO BE JUST RIGHT, or
else the effect does not manifest.

This should tell you something about this kind of downshifting theory, as well as the Chubb theories, and W&L theory. In many cases the LENR reactions have been determined to occur at or very near the surface. This presents two major problems: (1) there is not enough material between the reaction site and the surface to screen gammas by the means suggested, and (2) the surfaces of cathodes are typically very dirty, hardly a pristine lattice.

Proof of the ability of a very thin film surface layer to screen high energy gammas by collective action should be relatively easy to obtain. All that is required is a an x-ray tube, an x-ray flux meter, and an x-ray transparent medium on which the surface film is deposited and operated under the proposed conditions.

Cold fusion as been proposed to be enhanced by nanostructures. A surface layer of nanoparticles one deep should be capable of producing LENR. If so, such a layer should not be capable of suppressing MeV level gammas - yet it should be feasible to test for high energy particles or gammas. I know of no one proposing a collective action which bridges nanoparticle gaps.

I think it is much more probable that high energy nuclear radiation is suppressed or downshifted before it leaves the reacting nucleus excited state. It seems to me the state of nuclei undergoing LENR is necessarily de-energized a priori, i.e. before the energy of fusion is released. An obvious mechanism to achieve this a priori de- energizing is one or more electrons in the reacting nucleus before the nuclear reaction occurs.


Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/




Reply via email to