On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]>wrote:
> ** > > > MIT? How is that possible. MIT is the epicenter of the anti-cold fusion > conspiracy... > > > If they're the epicenter of the "conspiracy" it's not a very effective > conspiracy. > It's not me that claim they are the epicenter, it's the conspiracy theorists, like Mallove's missive, lays the blame for cold fusion's failure at the feet of MIT. (Yes Hagelstein's presence is another counter-example. If they can't even keep their own in line, how are we to believe they can suppress research all over the planet.) > (FYI, IIRC, Jed has said, repeatedly, that in his opinion there is no > conspiracy to suppress CF, > That's because "conspiracy theory" is usually code for crazy theory. He doesn't label it a conspiracy theory, but what he describes fits the bill.
