I've tossed a few posters into my filter, generally for an excess of unamusing 
puns, but I never understood the theory of compounding the annoyance with long 
announcements of same. 



On Nov 21, 2011, at 0:56, Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Apparently, Mary is less pathological case than Cude, but problem is that she 
> is a perpetual motion machine that goes endlessly onwards and onwards without 
> need for input energy (food). Like she has moral oblication to protect poor 
> and consideration inable investors from getting cheated.
> 
> It would be nice if we could introduce her and other hyperactive posters a 
> special rule that there is a two post per day limit for messages that contain 
> quoted material and after the quota is exceeded there should be required 24 
> hour delay before reply can be sent. This would effectively prevent inboxes 
> to overflow without limiting too much discussion. Actually, it should enhance 
> the quality of discussion, because people would think more carefully what is 
> relavant to say.
> 
> For filtering people, usually it is plausible to filter not just messages 
> that come from the address jounivalko...@gmail.com, but also messages where 
> the body contain a phrase "Jouni Valkonen" or email address. This way also 
> replies will get filtered.
> 
> Also with filtering with Gmail, instead of diverting them into thrash bin, it 
> would be better to mark them as "read" automatically. This way it is easy to 
> ignore them in threads, but if there are new topics posted they still appear 
> in the inbox and will get noted, although not necessarily read.
> 
> —Jouni
> 
> Ps. After Mary came here I have in my inbox more than 70 threads that contain 
> unread messages. I would say that there is definitely a problem with posting 
> frequency.
> 
> 
> On Nov 21, 2011 1:33 AM, "Daniel Rocha" <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jed, that is NOT possible. He would still see people answering the same 
> things over and over again. What makes MY annoying is not the arguments, but 
> the repetition. But the repetition is not only hers, it is also from whoever 
> answer. So, it won't work just blocking. 
> 
> 2011/11/20 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
> Esa Ruoho <esaru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> you guys had a real nice list going. then mary yugo joined. im out of here.
> 
> Why don't you just block out Mary Yugo's message? Problem solved.
> 
> I'll do that in a week or so, and stop responding.
> 
> - Jed
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> danieldi...@gmail.com
> 

Reply via email to