Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, you did miss something. The box with fins was the cell. But I suspect
>> you knew that. Please do not play games -- if you did know that, do not
>> pretend you did not.
>>
>>
> I don't think so.  What I read was that the finned box was another heat
> exchanger with three cores within.
>

Right, that's what I meant. It is the part labeled "Reactor" in Higgins'
diagram, which is not to scale:

http://lenr-canr.org/RossiData/Higgins%20Oct%206%2027kWreactorDiagram4.png



>   I have no way to check that.
>

Of course you do. That device is where the power leads and hydrogen gas
leads went to. It is clearly the only source of heat, so it has to be the
cell. Even if it is a fake cell, it is still the origin of the heat. Lead
and steel walls do not spontaneously heat up.



>   If it was the cell, isn't it much larger than previous cells?  A factor
> of three or more larger?
>

No, about the same. Plus there are three cells in this one. There is about
the same amount of active Ni catalyst. That is the only meaningful ratio.
The mass or volume of other stuff such as lead shielding is not relevant to
power density.

- Jed

Reply via email to