To me, Rossi’s actions are entirely understandable given the nascent state
of his invention. In the very early stages of development, a presenter at a
sales demo will emphasize what works and try to hide what doesn’t work
well. I confess I have done this myself.

It is the job of the audience to tease out the truth of the state of
development. It takes work to do this. One cannot sit back and whine that
the true does not unfold before them without some effort to inquire and
analyze.

In this cat and mouse game between Rossi and his customers,  Rossi will be
developing his invention for many years to come continuing by revising and
improving it as he goes along just as he has done for the last year.

Edison, the Wright brothers, and Tesla did the same sort of things as Rossi
is doing now. Customer feedback is important which presupposes that the
product will evolve over time.
Nobody introduces a world changing technology full blown into our world
right from its start.






On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:

>  So let’s show a little more appreciation and compassion toward the guy
>> that got the ball rolling.  His business plans might cause him to be
>> eclipsed by a more professional organization now that the door has been
>> cracked open but I will always remember what Mr. Rossi has accomplished no
>> matter what transpires.
>
>
> I disagree.  Rossi could have easily proven his device and principle real
> by now, many times over at little risk and cost.  He was told, here and
> elsewhere including his blog and probably by phone, exactly how to do
> that.  Instead, he continued to use bad measurement methods and brief
> tests, all conducted under his auspices.  For some inexplicable reason, he
> decided to make a large machine consisting of small modules.  There would
> be no conceivable reason for anyone to buy it except to reverse engineer it
> if it's real..  Nobody can prove he actually sold it.  Nobody can prove
> *convincingly* that Rossi's E-cat works as he says he does.  All of this is
> entirely Rossi's fault.  I have no idea what if anything he accomplished
> except to keep a monumental soap opera going for nine months.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to