Hi David how do you consider *facts* these data ? All we have in our hands are Rossi's claims.
2011/11/6 David Roberson <[email protected]> > I would like to have access to the known facts associated with the > latest test of the 1 MW ECAT system. Is it possible for us as a group to > keep a list of what we know must be true about the test and other facts > that influence the measured performance? I am including a beginning list > that should be reviewed for accuracy and appended to by vortex members. Thank > you. > 1). The ECATs were preloaded with water prior to beginning the test. > a). A reasonable estimate of the water held within the 107 ECATs is 107 > units x 30 liters/unit = 3210 liters. > b). The water within the 107 ECATs is replaced in approximately 3210 > liters / 675.6 liters/hour = 4.75 hours. > 2). There is no pump within the output path between the ECAT’s and the > large water storage tank. > a). This configuration absolutely demands that the output vapor must be > greater than atmospheric pressure. This is necessary to push the water out > of the dissipaters. > b). This pressure can be estimated by someone who is skilled in the > calculation of liquid and vapor flow through pipes and dissipaters. > 3). The average input water flow rate for the ECAT’s was 675.6 liters/hour. > a). The output flow rate is 675.6 liters/hour / 3600 seconds/hour * 1000 > grams/liter = 187.667 grams/second. Using this value and information > from NIST leads to the following conclusion. > b). 105 C is the average temperature output of the system, > and 18 C average input. > c). If only liquid water is ejected by the ECATs, the minimum system power > output is 187.667 grams/second * (440.27 joules/gram liquid at 105 C – > 75.544 joules/gram liquid at 18 C) = 68.45 Kilowatts. > d). If vapor is the only output then the maximum system power output is > 187.667 grams/second * (2683.4 joules/gram vapor at 105 C – 75.544 > joules/gram liquid at 18 C) = 489.4 Kilowatts. > e). The true power output of the system must lie between these two values. > 4). The customer had an engineer named Domenico Fioravanti and helpers to > verify operation of the system. > Dave >
