Dont ask me. Ask Rossi, ask Levi, ask Focardi, ask Passi or any other from this team.
There is a very obvious answer, but it is impossible to prove, so I cannot give an answer. Also I have learned in live, the obvious answers are sometimes false and there are other surprising explanations. Peter > Hi Peter, > > In every test there's been something missing. Why? > > Colin > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes this is true. > > It was a quick idea that I had during work and posted during work without > > much consideration. > > > > Rossi should have released the steam into the air after the testing was > > finished. This would give 300 liter of dry steam per second but in air up > > in the sky it will condense and should look impressive. > > > > Even better: If he had used this 105 degree steam to heat water in a > > secondary vessel with a heatexchanger, and let the water evaporate into > the > > sky, this would look impressive and it would be hard if not impossible to > > have any doubts about the steam quality and energy. Worldwide attention > > would have been guaranteed, especially if then police and fire brigades > > come and stop the experiment. ;-) > > > > Peter > > > > > > ----- Original Nachricht ---- > > Von: Colin Hercus <[email protected]> > > An: [email protected] > > Datum: 03.11.2011 02:43 > > Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations > > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > > > It could only be a vacuum if they were pumping the water out of the > heat > > > dissipater and they'd need a pretty good pump to get a vacuum. > > > > > > Colin > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:17 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I recalculated the pipe diameter needed for the 1MW plant. > > > > There is an important consideration that might have been missed by > > many: > > > > > > > > If all steam is condensed in the heatdissipator then we cannot assume > > air > > > > pressure at the other end of the pipe. > > > > In this case we must assume almost vacuum at the other side. > > > > > > > > If this is considered, we cannot use a steam pipe calculation for 1 > > bar. > > > > We must assume 2 bar for the pressure difference. > > > > So Rossis statement, almost airpressure at this point, where the > > > > temperature was measured, could be true. > > > > Also a inner pipe diameter of about 8.5 cm (as I have measured) could > > > work > > > > in this case. > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
