Am 01.10.2011 00:45, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Yes, but this is not what is needed.
The Rossi device is inaccessible. An accessible and working device
is needed to do LENR research.
Defkalion says they will begin selling commercial quantities of these
devices next year. This will make them available to do LENR research.
I don't see what your problem is.
Jed, I dont want to create a conflict that is not needed and is not
helpful to anybody.
They can do both.
This experiment
<http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19960016952_1996035672.pdf>
has some advantages.
1) Repeatable.
2) There is no time consuming preparation needed for the nickel wires.
3) The device is documented and known.
So they must first make absolutely sure that this works. They could use
a catalyzer to recombine all hydrogen and oxygen, then they can seal the
device against air and can precisely measure it.
Or they can make an arrangement to capture hydrogen and oxygen and
measure the volume.
It must also be measured that no CO2 bubbles out. This could be
possible, because they use K2CO3 as an electrolyte.
If this all is successful and has a positive surplus energy result, then
they can:
1) Examine the nickel wires chemically and with electronmicroscope and
all advanced methods that they have.
2) Precisely measuring neutrons and gamma radiation and gamma spectrum.
3) Repeat the experiment under high pressure and high temperatures, to
see if the COP can be increased.
4) They could try to inject purified hydrogen into the cell instead
doing electrolysis.
5) They can if it works with solid state material instead using a fluid
system
This experiment has the big advantage it is repeatable and has short
turnaround time, this should speed up everything in research and R&D and
they could finally develop this into better methods in an evolutionary
approach.
They did this experiment in 1995 and I dont understand why they didnt
continue these experiments, when they had success.
Best,
Peter
