At 01:50 PM 8/7/2011, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-08-07 01:32 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Rossi, from his announcement, never trusted them with the catalyst.
Therefore, if they did discover the catalyst, they did not obtain
it from disclosure, and he's going to have a devil of a time trying
to prove that they stole the process.
What makes you think there is a catalyst?
I don't. However, lots of people have worked with Ni-H, without such
striking results as was claimed. If there are improved results --
that's "if" -- then there is probably something being done that
hasn't been disclosed.
All we have is Rossi's word for it.
That's right.
The alleged "catalyst" has provided a very convenient means for
preventing anyone else from event attempting a real replication. As
such, it's been a powerful tool for Rossi ... whether it actually
exists or not.
It's a completely feeble excuse. There was no open and sane reason to
disallow "black box" tests.
