On 11-06-18 04:22 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
I'm quite sure I'm playing his game by reporting this here, but I
found this message by Rossi on his blog of interest on many levels and
probably bound to generate many reactions:
* * *
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=96&cpage=1#comment-47000
Dear Paolo:
The 1 MW plant which we will start up in Greece in October will
generate heat. For power we are not yet ready, but we made a very
important step forward in this week, because our reactors now produce
a totally dry steam (no more traces of water in the steam) and this is
a step forward to couple the turbines.
Then earlier assertions that the steam was totally dry must have been
... I hate to use the word ... lies.
A "lie" is when someone makes a contrary to fact statement, with the
full realization that it's contrary to fact. That certainly seems to
have been the case here, as this statement by Rossi seems to imply he's
known all along that the steam wasn't really quite dry.
So if the earlier assertions of dryness were lies, why should we believe
the new statement that this time, for sure, the steam really is dry?
