Thank you, Robin. It seems we have to wait for reallly reliable analytical data in order to know what happens. And an answer to the great question- does CIHT work and what are the performances. Peter
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: > At 03:51 PM 5/16/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: > >> One other point bears mentioning. The output was much too low for a pure >> fusion >> reaction. That implies that Hydrogen was "consumed" while generating less >> energy >> that from a fusion reaction, or perhaps it was just absorbed by the Ni, >> and >> never reacted, or perhaps the uncertainty in the "0.11 gm" is much larger >> than >> has been implied. >> > > I doubt that much of the 0.11g of hydrogen was 'consumed' -- that's the > amount that gets into the reactor chamber. Only a very small amount would > be anywhere near the nickel (assuming it's on the wall : approx area of > wall * diameter of a nickel particle / volume of reactor) , only part of > that would get into the lattice (or whatever), and only part of THAT would > react. > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
