> > A person can believe anything, but you do not have a rational > reason for believing this particular assertion. You cannot show > how or why they are mired in confusion, or point to any likely > error in their technique.
As I understand it, Rossi is claiming to do something that people who know a lot about this sort of thing believe is not possible. Until enough people have reverse-engineered his device and gotten the same amazing performance that he claims, it seems more likely that he and his colleagues have made a mistake than that they have an amazing new invention.
