> "Rossi device makes sense only if it is used to produce electricity. And as > I argued earlier - centralized (> 50 or 150 MW Thermal) and not > decentralized. Nuclear active devices must be highly localized and confined > to a small well-supervised space and not scattered all over the landscape. > Human beings are generally not reliable in decentralized matters, esp. > nuclear. Some central control has proved to be necessary - better do it > right from the beginning." > > I disagree. > I discussed this issue in my book. > - Jed > Yes that's completely wrong: when Rossi's device will enter in the commercial world it will for sure follow two development paths: 1. Huge plants to replace nuclear, gas, coal in the meantime. 2. nano plants to be installed under your water tap for hot water and with nano turbines to susbstitute batteries in electronic devices, in the long term.
Huge plants will die as there is a huge energy loss due to transportation and cost for distribution... remember *cheaper energy is not free energy*. mic
